Spock’s brain splits into 2 states

I’m a closet Trekkie without the elf ears or phaser.  I don’t attend those goofy conventions but I love Star Trek and have since I was a kid.  A few times a year when I can’t sleep, I have a ST marathon (I have all the DVDs. And for the original series I go to FirstOnMars.com or hulu.com and watch on my computer.)

I like the original series and the Next Generation – don’t watch the newer incarnations like DeepSpace 9. As far as I’m concerned, no one can be better Enterprise captains than William Shatner or Patrick Stewart.

Live long and prosper with a 2 state solution - Mr.Spock

Why am I telling you all this Star Trek stuff? Answer: Because Mr. Spock has come out for a 2 state solution in Israel. Leonard Nimoy is an 80 year old 2 stater Jew. I know he’s a Jew thanks to Adam Sandler:

Nimoy is advocating splitting Jerusalem. Making it the capitol of both Israel and the Palestinians, in addition to land swaps.  What land is going to be swapped? If the Palestinians have control of the holy sites that are now in the hands of the Jews, will they remain open to all? I doubt it and so does Andrew Klavan:

In his letter, Nimoy sites the episode of ST called Let this be your last battlefield (Season 3, episode 15.)  Two aliens are transported on board the Enterprise who have been in mortal combat for thousands of centuries. If you get a chance to watch the episode, it’s an obvious portrayal of the race issues in America in the ’60’s.

Star Trek - Let this be your last battlefield

Both men are half black and half white and the only difference is that white is on the left of one and on the right of the other.  The dialog is Oppressor vs Oppressed, bad guy/good guy and guess who’s the oppressive bad guy? The one (Frank Gorshin) who represents the white American male. He’s white on his right.  Get it?  (As a side note, this is the television Primetime Propaganda that Ben Shapiro writes about in his new book.)

So Nimoy thinks that a lesson can be learned from this episode of centuries old conflict and puts it in the context of the 2 state solution in Israel.  I’m not really seeing a connection here. Israel has taken a dry desert and turned it green. It’s created a nation that is the most productive and democratic in the entire region – a nation that is open to anyone and just to all, including women and gays, unlike it’s Muslim neighbors. It has never enslaved Palestinians (as the ST episode posits about Black Americans.) It has never religiously oppressed them, as their Muslim neighbors do to Christians and Jews.

The ST episode and the letter Nimoy has written suggests and encourages a form a reparation for the oppressed (Black Americans in the 60’s and now Palestinians.)  This is not only unrealistic (I mean, after all it was just tv!) but dangerous to the Jewish state.  How will Israel be more prosperous, more safe with the Palestinians owning half of Jerusalem and swaths of the country? These are people who have sworn their intent is to destroy Israel.

And why do the Israelis owe reparations to the Palestinians? They never enslaved or stole this land from anyone. It was a UN charter that granted this land to them. Why have the other Muslim nations not absorbed the Palestinians into their nations but instead expect the Israelis to do so?

A 2 state solution will not work. It will empower the Palestinians to attack the Jews and to take more and more if they can get away with it. It’s their stated goal to eradicate the Jewish state and giving them more of a toehold by donating half of the holiest of cities, Jerusalem to them, will only encourage them on their dastardly course.

My message to Mr.Spock is logical: In television, conflicts that have simmered for centuries are routinely solved in less than 50 minutes. Not so in real life.

~~ooOoo~~

By the way, if you’re not a trekkie you probably don’t get the reference in the title of this blog, to another ST episode: Spock’s Brain.  In that episode, Spocks brain is surgically removed by another alien invader, much prettier than Frank Gorshin, and he’s kept alive by the gifts of Dr. “Bones” McCoy.  (insert smiley face emoticon here, please.)

Come on, ask me anything Star Trek — I got an answer for it!

‘Primetime Propaganda’: Martin Bashir (MSNBC) focuses on Sesame Street

Ben Shaprio, is a syndicated columnist and author of the book, PROJECT PRESIDENT and his new book Primetime Propaganda.

Vodpod videos no longer available. 

Did you catch that? Black Americans don’t have reading material in their homes but they do have tv.  Ben Shapiro’s new book Primetime Propaganda.

‘Primetime Propaganda’: Martin Bashir (MSNBC) f…, posted with vodpod

Just a few words on hypocrisy and stupid

I just have a couple of things I’d like to drop here:

High speed commuter rail:  One word – Amtrak. And if it were so profitable, why isn’t Union Pacific building them?

Black supremacy groups: see Jill Scott (whoever the hell she is) or Common who are against inter-racial marriage. Pop quiz: What’s the difference between Black Americans who hold those opinions and the Aryan Nation? And don’t tell me it’s guns. One need only look at the Black on Black crime in this country to see that’s not true.

Racial bigotry: see Jill Scott and Common, again. Let a white entertainer say those same things and you’d be seeing the end of a career.

Joe Biden. ‘Nuff said.

The Soft Bigotry of the Democrats abortion legislation

[Congressman Bart] Stupak offers an interesting take on why [democrat] party leaders don’t want his effort to succeed.  “If you pass the Stupak amendment, more children will be born, and therefore it will cost us millions more. That’s one of the arguments I’ve been hearing,” Stupak says. “Money is their hang-up. Is this how we now value life in America? If money is the issue – come on, we can find room in the budget. This is life we’re talking about.”

If this quote doesn’t say it all about the purpose behind this health care bill, nothing does. If this statement does not make it clear that this party is dominated by a culture of death, nothing does. But more still, it really paints the democrats as a party of bigotry and racial controls.

Whose abortions do the Dems want us to pay for? That would be the poor. They want to control the population of the “poor.” Who are the poor in this country? Mostly minorities: the very people the dems claim to be protecting and helping are the very people they want to eliminate. By funding and making abortions easier, more accessible and paid for, they will be aiding in the elimination of the very people whose votes they court.

From The Center for Bio-Ethical Reforms: “Black women are more than 3 times as likely as white women to have an abortion, and Hispanic women are roughly 2 times as likely.” Nearly 49% of all abortions are obtained by women whose family income is less than $30,000/year, only 14% by those whose family income is over $60,000.

This is the “soft bigotry” that George W. Bush talked about. And what’s more perplexing is that this legislation is supported by… MINORITIES and their messiah, Obama – a half-black man! It’s astounding that the statists have convinced minorities that they are “looking out for them” when in truth they are covertly producing legislation that will slowly eliminate them!

And the very organization that assists with “women in need” is “excited” to be taking money to abort minority babies!