An example of reading between the lines, ferreting out Obamas lies and correcting the message

“Americans have to make tough choices about how to live within their means while still investing in their future and the President’s choices are no different. The President is looking forward to talking directly to the American people and sharing his commitment to making deep cuts, so that we can continue to invest in areas like innovation that will help our economy continue to grow,” said Adam Abrams, a White House spokesman. (from here.)

It’s amazing how one paragraph can say so much about a person, an ideology, a regime.

Americans do have to make tough choices about living within our means. No questions about that and no argument here. But in my lifetime experience, you first live within your means and pay off your debts and then you save and invest for your future. You get out of the hole you’ve dug for yourself and then you move on to a, hopefully, brighter future. You can’t invest in your future, you can’t save for your kids college fund when you’re $200,000 in debt. The debt comes first.  Or your kid has no college fund and your family will probably not have a  home to live in, either.

It’s not the governments job to invest in innovation.  And it’s not the governments job to determine what businesses to invest in. The private sector is in the best position to judge that, through competition and whatever drives the marketplace. When the government starts meddling in the creation of business, it invariably starts paying back political favors and not doing what’s best for the citizens as a whole.  The government can create a climate where businesses can grow, by lowering the tax base, for instance, as Rep. Paul Ryan has spelled out in his budget plan, but it’s not capable of creating jobs in the private sector. It can only expand itself with more useless bureaucrats and regulations.  We’ve all seen plenty of that in the last 2 years. And we’ve all been paying for it, too.

That original first paragraph screams socialism to the sharp eye.

It’s a seemingly simple message, in one short paragraph that says so much to the astute reader. Unfortunately, there are too many in this country who don’t read closely enough and who aren’t keenly listening. 

This is why Barack Obama is our president now.  And why we have to be, in Mark Levin’s words, the Paul and Paulette Reveres of our families and communities.

So patriots, GET OUT THERE AND CORRECT THE MESSAGE!

Fey says Palin impersonations has not helped 30 Rock

Here’s proof that the television industry does not care about ratings or what the audience wants to see: 30 Rock was renewed for a 6th season and has won many Emmy Awards while it’s ratings remain low. But according to Fox 411 it receives “rave reviews from critics.”

Tina Fey, who co-stars with fellow left wing comrade Alec Baldwin on this hardly-watched program, says in her new book – Bossypants –  that doing Palin ‘gags’ has likely hurt the show. She says that she and Alec are viewed by “50%” of America as “pinko commie monsters.”  I’d say yes, but I’d also say that the percentage is higher than that.

She also acknowledges that they are both polarizing figures in American entertainment.

And yet, the show with low ratings remains on the air because “critics rave” about it.

These guys who run the networks and the critics who write about the shows, don’t care about what YOU want to watch. They only care about what they WANT you to watch.

And as a disclaimer: I’ve never seen this show so have no idea if it’s any good or not.

Read more: http://entertainment.blogs.foxnews.com/2011/04/05/did-tina-feys-sarah-palin-impersonation-backfire/#ixzz1IfUBB9Xp

 

Matthews: ‘Maybe It’s God’s Will Obama Not Have a Reasonable GOP Opponent’ | NewsBusters.org

Matthews: ‘Maybe It’s God’s Will Obama Not Have a Reasonable GOP Opponent’ | NewsBusters.org.