Look past this man’s right shoulder and what do you see? And could it be more appropriate considering this guy’s an atheist? This is a simple photoshop trick.
All I can say is: Well done, Fox graphics department!
Look past this man’s right shoulder and what do you see? And could it be more appropriate considering this guy’s an atheist? This is a simple photoshop trick.
All I can say is: Well done, Fox graphics department!
Our Charge is to Protect the Blessings of Freedom
9/11 Never Forget
DRS on Who is Peter Joseph? I think,… | |
Dena on On Birthdays, Anniversaries an… | |
bydesign001 on Protesting hypocrites | |
bydesign001 on Protesting hypocrites | |
AFVet on What We Didn’t Know About the… | |
roxannadanna on What We Didn’t Know About the… | |
AFVet on What We Didn’t Know About the… | |
funnyclimatechange on A Future Fox News Alert? | |
rick headlee on Thank you all | |
Tammy on Stand with Israel. Sign the… |
Helmets for all!
“Brace yourselves, because the war with Muslims has just begun,” 31-year-old Faisal Shahzad told a federal judge. “Consider me the first droplet of the blood that will follow.”
"We can absorb a terrorist attack. We'll do everything we can to prevent it, but even a 9/11, even the biggest attack ever...we absorbed it and we are stronger."
May 10th, 2010 at 10:02 AM
The guy has a good argument in so much that the government isn’t allowed to promote a religion. However, the government isn’t to hinder the freedom to practice one’s religous faith as well. He’s in error citing the treaty signed at Tripoli, when using it as a separation of church and state “document”.
The agreement at Tripoli was written to assure the ‘subjects of Tripoli’ and the Barbary (Muslims) that the United States government, not being founded on the Christian religion, basically won’t be a threat to the “harmony existing between the two countries”.
The Muslims were concerned that the United States would be influenced by Christianity against their culture. Article 11 was simply to address that concern.
May 10th, 2010 at 10:17 AM
That’s great information and thank you.
The government is not promoting religion because no one is forced to submit to it (unlike the religion of the left – the green church – which we will all be forced to submit to.) If prayer offends you, don’t participate in it. What is happening today is that those who do want to participate in it, are being prohibited from doing so.
That is a direct violation of the Constitution.
May 10th, 2010 at 2:25 PM
Yes ma’am. The left contends that the courts are not prohibiting the excerise of religion, when in fact they are. Freedom of religion means just that: freedom to practice one’s religion. No one is being forced to pray … like you said, don’t participate. Kinda like watching television. If you don’t like whats on, don’t watch it.