Daily Archives: September 6, 2009

When racism and fear-mongering is an entitlement

How much more divisive can a president be when you have countless parents who are willing to keep their children home from school rather than listen to a speech by Obama?

Would they have done this with either Bush presidents? How about with Bill Clinton? I had school age children at those times. I wouldn’t have had an issue with my kids hearing a speech at school from any other president. I can’t imagine a time when we would’ve felt it dangerous for our children to hear a president speak, until now.

And that’s it – parents feel it’s dangerous for their children to hear from this president. This is a telling and creepy thing in American history.  Americans are afraid of this man. They are afraid for their future, for their children’s future, of what he can do to ruin it.

How much more proof do we need to see the divide he has created in this nation? Can you remember a time, in your lifetime, when we were so divided? Did you ever feel that race was a serious issue in your life, until now? It’s almost daily that we hear something derogatory about “the white man” from some politician or some presidential czar. It’s become so commonplace to hear that it’s almost lost it’s impact.

“The white man stole all the land, all that was valuable, broke all the treaties with the Indians.”

“The white man is poisoning the poorer neighborhoods with pollutants.”

“The white man is spraying insecticides and toxins on illegal immigrants.”

“It’s only white, suburban kids who shoot up schools. Black kids only kill each other, they don’t shoot up the whole school.”

“White people don’t want a president who looks like me (a Black woman.)”

“White folks go to bed at night asking themselves “how did this happen?” – electing a black man to the presidency.”

White people would never get by with making these kinds of comments, especially elected white politicians.

But ‘they’ won so they are entitled to be racist. And by ‘they’ I mean any Marxist – white, black or polka dot. They believe that they have been oppressed by white America for so long that they feel entitled to be racist.  It’s only fair, yes? Because they won.

Think about this: why are parents refusing to let their children hear this presidential speech on Tuesday? What is motivating American parents to protect their children from a speech by the president of the United States?

The answers to those questions should make you be more afraid.

When the left media finally addresses Jones, it’s like this:

Up until recently, Van Jones, who is widely respected as an environmental activist, has been targeted by conservative pundits, who argue that his impolitic remarks, and the fact that he once identified as a “communist,” raises concerns about a secret agenda in the Obama White House, a suggestion that is unhinged, and not only because President Obama is in no way pursuing any policies that can be accurately characterized as “communist.” Jones, for his own part, no longer espouses “communism,” and his role, as an adviser to the CEQ, puts him at a far remove from major questions of economic policy.

But the fact that Jones appears to have espoused conspiracy theories about 9/11 seems to have changed the conversation, if only because the White House is now playing defense, declining to answer reporter questions. As it now stands, the White House does not have a ready answer for Jones’ past behavior, beyond the fact that he says he no longer agrees with those views. Heading into Labor Day weekend, White House spokesman Gibbs just does not want to talk about it.

From Time magazine

These 2 paragraphs speak for themselves. I don’t need to point out to you where the author’s gone wrong. It’s an opinion piece so there is no expectation of fairness and bias is expected, but this is a good illustration of the Obama apologetic press.

Something to think about

How many of these conditions have now been met in America? How many are about to be met under the Obama administration?

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. If you don’t know what eminent domain is, this is it.

2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. Needs no further explanation.

3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. Death taxes.

4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. Once again, eminent domain.

5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the State, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.  Since the bailouts, the State owns the banks and the federal reserve.

6. Centralization of a means of communication and transport in the hands of the State. Fairness Doctrine as a control over talk radio. Ownership of the auto industry which, for one thing, will culminate in an attempt to control our mobility.

7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State, the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan. Can you spell Green Jobs?

8. Equal liability of all labor. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. Again, Green Jobs, the power of the unions in this administration.

9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries: gradual abolition of the distinction between town and country by more equitable distribution of the population over the country

10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. Free public education, we have aleady. Obama’s Americorp initiative, targeting young Americans.

These are the conditions, according to the Communist Manifesto, that must be met in order for a nation (and in Marx dream, the entire world) to transiton from capitalism to communism.

Watch what Obama does, who he appoints and who his “czars” are,  what goals he has set. We’re going to see Marx’ communist manifesto realized before his first term is over.