From the SINDYA N. BHANOO/NYT:
To meet the Obama administration’s targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions, some researchers say, Americans may have to experience a sobering reality: gas at $7 a gallon.
To reduce carbon dioxide emissions in the transportation sector 14 percent from 2005 levels by 2020, the cost of driving must simply increase, according to a forthcoming report by researchers at Harvard’s Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs.
The 14 percent target was set in the Environmental Protection Agency’s budget for fiscal 2010.
In their study, the researchers devised several combinations of steps that United States policymakers might take in trying to address the heat-trapping emissions by the nation’s transportation sector, which consume 70 percent of the oil used in the United States.
Most of their models assumed an economy-wide carbon dioxide tax starting at $30 a ton in 2010 and escalating to $60 a ton in 2030. In some cases researchers also factored in tax credits for electric and hybrid vehicles, taxes on fuel or both.
In the modeling, it turned out that issuing tax credits could backfire, while taxes on fuel proved beneficial.
“Tax credits don’t address how much people use their cars,” said Ross Morrow, one of the report’s authors. “In reverse, they can make people drive more.”
Dr. Morrow, formerly a fellow at the Belfer Center, is a professor of mechanical engineering and economics at Iowa State University
Researchers said that vehicle miles traveled will increase by more than 30 percent between 2010 and 2030 unless policymakers increase fuel taxes.
Okay. So unless the government stop us, we will continue to travel, ship produce and other consumer goods, and even go to work. Unless they stop us by taxing the hell out of us. This also limits our ability to move to another city or state.
How many of us can afford gas this high? How many of us can afford to pay for food or other consumer goods when gas goes this high? How many truckers will be out of work? How many farmers? What about the car companies, like Government Motors, that can’t ship cars to people who can’t afford to drive them anyway? Where will the union workers find jobs?
The idea of this is cataclysmic to our economy. We think 10% unemployment is bad? We’ve seen nothing yet.
Once they control our health care, cap and trade is next. They will be confining us to one place. Easier to control the population that way, isn’t it?















March 18th, 2010 at 11:13 AM
[...] Progressivism GayPatriot: The Most Important Video I’ve Ever Posted. Diary of a Mad Conservative: The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon Michelle Malkin: The trillion-dollar government pension bubble Americans Against Obama: Harry Reid [...]
March 11th, 2010 at 6:58 PM
[...] Progressivism GayPatriot: The Most Important Video I’ve Ever Posted. Diary of a Mad Conservative: The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon Michelle Malkin: The trillion-dollar government pension bubble Americans Against Obama: Harry Reid [...]
March 11th, 2010 at 6:58 PM
[...] Progressivism GayPatriot: The Most Important Video I’ve Ever Posted. Diary of a Mad Conservative: The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon Michelle Malkin: The trillion-dollar government pension bubble Americans Against Obama: Harry Reid [...]
March 11th, 2010 at 7:58 AM
[...] documentary American Elephant: This Is Your Country on Progressivism Diary of a Mad Conservative: The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon Michelle Malkin: The trillion-dollar government pension bubble Motor City Times: Harry Reid: Only [...]
March 7th, 2010 at 5:46 PM
[...] Progressivism GayPatriot: The Most Important Video I’ve Ever Posted. Diary of a Mad Conservative: The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon Michelle Malkin: The trillion-dollar government pension bubble Americans Against Obama: Harry Reid [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 10:54 AM
[...] Mad Conservative: Hate-mongering, gun brandishing, racists: the Patriot movement. and Bill Whittle: Ghosts of Independence and WSJ: Abuse of Power and New From GM: The 2010 Obamamobile and The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:45 AM
[...] Mad Conservative: Hate-mongering, gun brandishing, racists: the Patriot movement. and Bill Whittle: Ghosts of Independence and WSJ: Abuse of Power and New From GM: The 2010 Obamamobile and The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 9:15 AM
[...] Mad Conservative: Hate-mongering, gun brandishing, racists: the Patriot movement. and Bill Whittle: Ghosts of Independence and WSJ: Abuse of Power and New From GM: The 2010 Obamamobile and The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:30 AM
[...] Mad Conservative: Hate-mongering, gun brandishing, racists: the Patriot movement. and Bill Whittle: Ghosts of Independence and WSJ: Abuse of Power and New From GM: The 2010 Obamamobile and The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 7:06 AM
[...] Mad Conservative: Hate-mongering, gun brandishing, racists: the Patriot movement. and Bill Whittle: Ghosts of Independence and WSJ: Abuse of Power and New From GM: The 2010 Obamamobile and The big brains at Harvard say gas at $7/gallon [...]
March 3rd, 2010 at 6:33 AM
Roxi – cut down the post I just made will ya?
March 3rd, 2010 at 6:33 AM
Roxi – they want the US to dry up and blow away. There are Muslims with questionable backgrounds working in the Department of Justice and over at creepingsharia.wordpress.com I read the following:
UK: Islamic radicals ‘infiltrate’ Labour Party
Posted on March 1, 2010 by creeping
Sounds like the various Muslim Brotherhood front groups in the U.S. From the Telegraph:
“They are acting almost as an entryist organisation, placing people within the political parties, recruiting members to those political parties, trying to get individuals selected and elected so they can exercise political influence and power, whether it’s at local government level or national level,” he said.
“They are completely at odds with Labour’s programme, with our support for secularism.”
Mr Fitzpatrick, the MP for Poplar and Canning Town, said the IFE had infiltrated and “corrupted” his party in east London in the same way that the far-Left Militant Tendency did in the 1980s. Leaked Labour lists show a 110 per cent rise in party membership in one constituency in two years.
In a six-month investigation by this newspaper and Channel 4’s Dispatches, involving weeks of covert filming by the programme’s reporters:
* IFE activists boasted to the undercover reporters that they had already “consolidated … a lot of influence and power” over Tower Hamlets, a London borough council with a £1 billion budget.
* We have established that the group and its allies were awarded more than £10 million of taxpayers’ money, much of it from government funds designed to “prevent violent extremism”.
* IFE leaders were recorded expressing opposition to democracy, support for sharia law or mocking black people. The IFE organised meetings with extremists, including Taliban allies, a man named by the US government as an “unindicted co-conspirator” in the 1993 World Trade Center bombing, and a man under investigation by the FBI for his links to the September 11 attacks.
* Moderate Muslims in London told how the IFE and its allies were enforcing their hardline views on the rest of the local community, curbing behaviour they deemed “un-Islamic”. The owner of a dating agency received a threatening email from an IFE activist, warning her to close it.
* George Galloway, a London MP, admitted in recordings obtained by this newspaper that his surprise victory in the 2005 election owed more to the IFE “than it would be wise – for them – for me to say, adding that they played a “decisive role” in his triumph at the polls.
March 2nd, 2010 at 9:51 PM
I just can’t afford to live in this country.
March 2nd, 2010 at 11:41 PM
I do not understand this. How can they possibly think that this nation can survive as a civilized society – in Mark Levin’s words – if they continue down this path? They can take our money, our homes, our bodys (in the form of universal health care) but eventually it will all dry up. There will be nothing left.
How does that translate into Utopia?
None of us can afford this. And none of this makes sense.
March 2nd, 2010 at 9:50 PM
Perfection in motion.